Harry & David Operations, Inc.

Harry & David Operations, Inc.

SERVING THE GREATER PHILADELPHIA AREA AND BEYOND

This lawsuit seeks to recover unpaid overtime compensation for Medford, Oregon call center employees of Harry & David Operations, Inc. The workers allege that Harry & David violated federal and Oregon wage law by failing to pay them for all their work activities including, for example, time spent logging into and starting up required computer programs prior to the start of their paid shift and time spent working off-the-clock during the shift.

This lawsuit is concluded. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or desire any additional information. We would be happy to answer your questions and, if permitted, provide you with additional information.

Explore Our Cases

Client Testimonials

  • "Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters."
    Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters.
    - Ricci v. Newrez LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186727, at *23 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023)
  • "Significant experience"

    Attorney Andy Santillo and his co-counsel are “patently qualified” attorneys who “have significant experience with wage payment and collections cases, knowledge of wage-and-hour law, and have clearly done significant work already in this case throughout discovery and the preparation of the motions and opposition papers now before the Court."

    - MARTINEZ V. AMAZON.COM SERVS. LLC, 2024 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 209566, *28, *42-43 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2024)
  • "An established record"

    W&S and its co-counsel "have an established record of competent and successful prosecution of large wage and hour class actions."

    - Lapan v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169508, *7 (D. Mass. Dec. 11, 2015)
  • "Experienced wage and hour class action litigators"

    W&S and its co-counsel "are experienced wage and hour class action litigators with decades of accomplished complex class action between them and that the Class Members have benefited tremendously from able counsel’s representation."

    - Craig v. Rite Aid Corp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2658, *45 (M.D. Pa. Jan 7, 2013)