
New Jersey Independent Contractors
Many companies misclassify workers as non-employee “independent contractors,” “contractors,” or “franchisees” to avoid paying overtime and other benefits that employees are typically entitled to. This misclassification is frequently seen with delivery drivers, food route drivers, construction workers, exotic dancers, sales employees and cable/internet installers, just to name a few.
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that it is illegal for most New Jersey companies to classify workers as “non-employee” contractors/franchisees. Under this ruling, misclassified workers could be entitled to unpaid overtime wages as well as the recovery of improper deductions by the company from your compensation for such things as fees for travel, vehicles, insurance and administrative costs.
If you work in New Jersey and your employer classifies you as a “non-employee” contractor/franchisee, you may be eligible to make a claim for unpaid wages and improper deductions. If you have any questions about this investigation or would like to discuss a potential claim, please contact us to speak with an attorney for a free and confidential consultation.
Fighting for Fair Wages.™
Our law firm fights for workers who have been deprived of their fair wages and overtime pay. Through diligence and experience, we have fought large and small corporations to recover millions of dollars for our hard-working clients and their deserving families. No corporation is above the law.
-
Helpful Information
-
Our ExperienceThrough diligence and experience, we have worked to recover hundreds of millions of dollars for our hard-working clients and their deserving families.
-
Who We Are
Client Testimonials
-
"Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters."
Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters.- Ricci v. Newrez LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186727, at *23 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023) -
"Significant experience"
Attorney Andy Santillo and his co-counsel are “patently qualified” attorneys who “have significant experience with wage payment and collections cases, knowledge of wage-and-hour law, and have clearly done significant work already in this case throughout discovery and the preparation of the motions and opposition papers now before the Court."
- MARTINEZ V. AMAZON.COM SERVS. LLC, 2024 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 209566, *28, *42-43 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2024) -
"An established record"
W&S and its co-counsel "have an established record of competent and successful prosecution of large wage and hour class actions."
- Lapan v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 169508, *7 (D. Mass. Dec. 11, 2015) -
"Experienced wage and hour class action litigators"
W&S and its co-counsel "are experienced wage and hour class action litigators with decades of accomplished complex class action between them and that the Class Members have benefited tremendously from able counsel’s representation."
- Craig v. Rite Aid Corp., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2658, *45 (M.D. Pa. Jan 7, 2013)
