Lancaster Wage & Hour Law

Our Office Location

  • Twining Office Center
    715 Twining Road
    Suite 211
    Dresher, PA 9025
    Map & Directions
  • "Significant experience"

    Attorney Andy Santillo and his co-counsel are “patently qualified” attorneys who “have significant experience with wage payment and collections cases, knowledge of wage-and-hour law, and have clearly done significant work already in this case throughout discovery and the preparation of the motions and opposition papers now before the Court."

    - MARTINEZ V. AMAZON.COM SERVS. LLC, 2024 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 209566, *28, *42-43 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2024)
  • "Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters."
    Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters.
    - Ricci v. Newrez LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186727, at *23 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023)
  • "Have significant experience in similar matters under the [Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act]"
    Winebrake & Santillo and their co-counsel “have significant experience in similar matters under the [Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act] and in the wage and hour context more broadly."
    - Torres v. Brandsafway Indus. LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10631, at *8 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2023).
  • "I highly recommend this law firm."
    I highly recommend this law firm. They immediately talked with me about my situation, made some great recommendations, and gave me some good advice to move forward. 5 stars all the way!
    - Brandon

Contact Us Today

Fill Out the Form Below to Get Started

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy

News & Insights

  • A SEASONED DISTRICT COURT JUDGE ASKS “WHY?”
  • THIRD CIRCUIT CLARIFIES TEST FOR DETERMINING WHETHER COLLEGE ATHLETES ARE “EMPLOYEES” UNDER FLSA