American Eagle Express
American Eagle Express
Serving the Greater Philadelphia Area and Beyond
This lawsuit seeks to recover unpaid wages for delivery drivers who worked for American Eagle Express, Inc. or AEXGroup (“AEX”). The drivers allege that because AEX classified them as independent contractors rather than employees, AEX violated New Jersey state law by failing to pay them overtime and making improper deductions to their compensation.
Case Updates
MAY 1, 2014
Today, our firm, along with co-counsel Lichten & Liss-Riordan, started this class action lawsuit by filing a Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against American Eagle Express, Inc. (d/b/a AEX Group). The lawsuit is brought on behalf of individuals who worked as delivery drivers in the state of New Jersey for AEX. The lawsuit alleges that, AEX classified these individuals as independent contractors and failed to pay extra overtime compensation when the drivers worked over 40 hours per week and also made impermissible deductions from their compensation. The lawsuit alleges that this practice violates New Jersey state law. You can access the Complaint below. If you would like additional information about the lawsuit and whether you are covered or potentially eligible to join, feel free to call our office at (215) 866-1551.
JUN 17, 2014
Today AEX filed an Answer to the Complaint in which it generally denied violating the law and asserted that their pay practices are legal. It also filed motion to dismiss the claims in the Complaint under the New Jersey doctrine of unjust enrichment and a Third-Party Complaint against the corporate entities utilized by the plaintiffs for purposes of being paid by AEX. Copies of these documents are below.
JUL 8, 2014
Today we filed an opposition to AEX’s motion to dismiss the claim for unjust enrichment. We also filed a motion to dismiss the third-party complaint that AEX Group filed against the corporate entities utilized by plaintiffs for purposes of being paid by AEX. You can access copies of these documents below.
SEP 22, 2014
Today we had an initial conference with the Magistrate Judge who has been assigned to this case. The purpose of this conference is to establish a scheduling order for this case.
FEB 13, 2015
Today we submitted a letter to the Court discussing the ramifications of the January 14, 2015 decision by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC. The Hargrove court held that the appropriate test for determining whether an individual is an “employee” or “independent contractor” for purposes of the New Jersey Wage and Hour Law, N.J.S.A. §§34:11-56a, et seq. (“NJWHL”) and the New Jersey Wage Payment Law (“NJWPL”), N.J.S.A. §§ 34:11-4.1, et seq. is the “ABC” test derived from the New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Act. Under the ABC test, an individual is presumed to be an employee unless the employer can demonstrate that:
(A) Such individual has been and will continue to be free from control or direction over the performance of such service, both under his contract of service and in fact; and
(B) Such service is either outside the usual course of the business for which such service is performed, or that such service is performed outside of all the places of business of the enterprise for which such service is performed; and
(C) Such individual is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.
The failure to satisfy any one of the three criteria results in an employment classification. A copy of this letter is available below.
MAY 6, 2015
Today Judge Esther Salas of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey held oral arguments on the parties’ cross-motions to dismiss. Judge Salas denied AEX’s motion to dismiss the drivers’ claim under the New Jersey doctrine of unjust enrichment. Judge Salas also denied the drivers’ motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint against the corporate entities utilized by the plaintiffs for purposes of being paid by AEX. A copy of the Court’s order is available below.
MAY 29, 2015
Today we filed a renewed motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint against the corporate entities utilized by the plaintiffs for purposes of being paid by AEX. You can access copies of these documents below.
SEP 8, 2015
Today we filed an opposition to AEX’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in which AEX argued that the drivers’ claims for unpaid wages and improper deductions are preempted by the by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA), 49 U.S.C. § 14501(c)(1). A copy of this opposition brief is available below.
MAR 11, 2016
Today, Judge Esther Salas of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey held oral arguments on two motions currently pending before the Court. The first was the drivers’ motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint against the corporate entities utilized by the plaintiffs for purposes of being paid by AEX. The second was AEX’s motion for judgment on the pleadings based on the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA). The Court should issue a ruling on these motions in the coming weeks.
NOV 21, 2016
Today we are pleased to announce that Judge Esther Salas of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey entered an order denying AEX’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. In her opinion, Judge Salas held that the drivers’ claims for unpaid wages and improper deductions are not preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA). Judge Salas also denied the drivers’ motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint against the corporate entities utilized by the plaintiffs for purposes of being paid by AEX. A copy of the Court’s ruling is available below.
JAN 3, 2017
Today we filed an opposition to AEX’s motion for leave to seek an appeal of the Court’s November 21, 2016 order denying AEX’s motion for judgment on the pleadings based on the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA). A copy of our opposition brief is available below. We expect the Court to rule in the coming weeks on this motion.
MAR 12, 2018
Today the Third Circuit Court of Appeal announced that it would allow AEX to appeal the District Court's November 21, 2016 order denying AEX’s motion for judgment on the pleadings based on the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 (FAAAA). A briefing schedule will be set by the Third Circuit in the coming weeks.
AUG 6, 2018
Today the appeal brief on behalf of the drivers was filed with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. A copy of this brief is accessible below.
AUG 17, 2018
We are pleased to announce that the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Public Citizen Inc. have each filed briefs with the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in support of our case. Copies of these briefs are available below.
JAN 29, 2019
Today, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a precedential decision holding that a federal law limiting state regulation of the trucking sector called the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act (“FAAAA”) does not preempt New Jersey’s ABC test for distinguishing between employees entitled to the state’s wage protections and independent contractors who are not. A copy of the Third Circuit’s opinion is available below. Under New Jersey’s version of the ABC test, an individual is presumed to be an “employee” unless a business can show the worker is free from its control or direction, performs work that is outside the usual course or place of business, and works “in an independently established trade, occupation, profession or business.” A business must demonstrate that all three prongs of the test are met to justify an independent contractor classification for workers. We are very excited about this development in the case.
JUN 12, 2019
Today a scheduling conference was held with the Court which set a September 13, 2019 deadline for Plaintiffs to file their motion for class certification. A copy of the Court's order is available below.
SEP 13, 2019
Today we filed our motion for class certification asking that the Court allow this case to proceed on behalf of all New Jersey drivers. We anticipate that the Court with hold a hearing or issue an opinion in the spring 2020.
JUN 29, 2020
Today the Court issued an order scheduling oral arguments on our motion for class certification for August 5, 2020.
AUG 17, 2022
Today we are excited to announce that the federal judge assigned to this case granted our motion for class certification. A copy of her opinion is available below. In the coming months, a Court approved notice will be mailed to those individuals who worked as drivers for AEX during the covered class period. If you have any questions, feel free to call us at (215) 866-1551.
Case Documents
-
“Significant experience” - MARTINEZ V. AMAZON.COM SERVS. LLC, 2024 U.S. DIST. LEXIS 209566, *28, *42-43 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2024)
-
“Winebrake & Santillo has a considerable record in employment matters.” - Ricci v. Newrez LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186727, at *23 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2023)
-
“Have significant experience in similar matters under the [Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act]” - Torres v. Brandsafway Indus. LLC, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10631, at *8 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 20, 2023).